#79 - From Plate to Planet: A Diet That Makes a Difference!

As the planet struggles to keep pace with our appetites, the true cost of our food choices is becoming impossible to ignore!

Agriculture is a leading driver of environmental stress, pushing multiple planetary boundaries to their limits. Current farming practices can sustainably support only about 3.4 billion people if we continue with today's resource-intensive, animal-heavy diets [4]. Meanwhile, the global population has soared past 8 billion. Clearly, something has to change.

Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research assessed that feeding ten billion people can be possible within four terrestrial planetary. This requires however major transformation of both: agricultural practices and adopting a less resource-intensive diet [4].

Food Quantity – More Than Enough, Yet Not Enough

Globally, the average per capita food production in 2010 stood at a staggering 5,359 kcal per person per day – far more than the 2,355 kcal needed for a healthy life [3,4]. Yet, once we factor in food waste, animal feed, and other non-food uses, only about 2,870 kcal per person per day remained available for direct human consumption in 2011 [3].

Despite this surplus, over 820 million people still lack sufficient food [2], while nearly 27% of the population in developed countries struggles with obesity (BMI > 30). This stark imbalance exposes the inefficiency of our current food systems.

Food Type – The High Cost of Animal Protein

A significant share of the world's agricultural output is used to feed farm animals rather than people. Shifting to a more plant-based diet could dramatically reduce the strain on land.

This would not only ease pressure on ecosystems but also make sustainable farming methods, like organic agriculture, more feasible. For example, producing 1,000 kilocalories from beef requires 120 square meters of land, compared to just 0.76 square meters for rice – a staggering 150-fold difference.

Health and Sustainability – Finding the Balance

The environmental case for dietary change aligns well with nutritional science. According to the EAT–Lancet Commission:

The examples of diets from the commission include optionally modest amounts of fish, meat and dairy foods [2]. This optionality accounts for some populations worldwide, which either depend on animal protein from livestock or undernutrition challenges can not be solved with plant food alone. Outside these specific contexts, no nutritional need for animal-based food was reported by the commission.

Transformational Capacity of Human Enterprise

OECD identified three main resilience capacities: absorbing, adapting and transforming, supported by the capacity to prepare [5]. Transformation means creating something fundamentally new when the old system can no longer sustain us.

Yet we face a troubling pattern: as soon as communities achieve a certain level of wealth, diets tend to shift toward overconsumption and heavy reliance on animal products – a path that strains both public health and planetary systems. This pattern is now being replicated across rapidly developing economies, multiplying the environmental burden.

Our resilience is now much more closely linked to the planet than in the past. With 8 billion people making a vast impact on the planet's capability to remain a healthy home for humanity, dietary choices have far reaching consequences.

Conclusion

The numbers tell a story of both abundance and scarcity—of calories produced in excess while hunger persists, of land stretched to its limits while more efficient alternatives exist. This paradox invites us to consider deeper questions about our food systems and our values.

What might our landscapes look like if agricultural practices prioritized both human and ecological health? How might our relationship with food evolve if we acknowledged the full costs of our dietary patterns? The research suggests that feeding our growing population within planetary boundaries is possible, but it requires us to reconsider long-held assumptions about diet and agriculture.

As we contemplate the meals before us, we participate in a quiet yet profound choice about the world we wish to create. The science of sustainability offers us information, but the wisdom to use it wisely rests in our collective hands. In the delicate balance between personal preference and planetary capacity lies the art of nourishing ourselves while ensuring that future generations may do the same.

If you like this post please join the growing community of forward-thinking readers and sign-up to my newsletter. My weekly posts explore how individuals and organizations adapt and evolve. Gain evidence-based insights to boost resilience across domains.

Notes and References

1. Ritchie H. (2021) - “If the world adopted a plant-based diet, we would reduce global agricultural land use from 4 to 1 billion hectares” Published online at OurWorldinData.org. Retrieved from: 'https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets' [Online Resource]

2. Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., ... & Murray, C. J. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The lancet, 393(10170), 447-492.

3. Clapp, J. (2017). Food self-sufficiency: Making sense of it, and when it makes sense. Food policy, 66, 88-96.

4. Gerten, D., Heck, V., Jägermeyr, J., Bodirsky, B. L., Fetzer, I., Jalava, M., ... & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2020). Feeding ten billion people is possible within four terrestrial planetary boundaries. Nature Sustainability, 3(3), 200-208.

5. OECD (2025), “Practical approaches to develop resilience strategies for food systems”, OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers, No. 217, OECD Publishing, Paris